Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Blog #8 Protesting Death

Tarfia Faizullah's poem "You Ask Why Write About It Again" is not explicitly about violence, but I think it does protest the elision of grief--possibly a grief caused by a violent/traumatic death. This poem works to remember the dead because they are still very much with us, because "a child's handprints are smudged / on cream and green walls". The anaphora of "because" is what resonates protest for me--it is insistent, it demands that the "you" addressed understands how mourning one's sister (blood or otherwise) can be all-consuming.

But there seems to be a need to control this overwhelm: the poem is in couplets which contain thoughts into digestible moments. Despite the formal restraint these images/feelings still push into each other through enjambment: "Because the blade held by the hand is still a blade / even when used for crushing and not cutting". This pressing together shows that the speaker is trying to hold two conflicting ideas at once and give them the ability to exist simultaneously. She holds together the desire to push away grief and the desire to remember.

In this poem she's taking the curative position that through naming, through remembering, one begins to heal. The grief "unnamed but questioned" is praised alongside the ailanthus moth "spinning its coarse silk because it cannot stop and it must". This last image is compelling in that it relates to the speaker's own act of writing and narrating as remembering, an act as natural as breathing or spinning silk if you're a moth. The poem can open to a more general social critique: that one must be open to the pain and grief of others, to keep our complicity in the system in check--because the blade that we use to crush can still cut. 


2 comments:

  1. The line "spinning its coarse silk because it cannot stop and it must" really stuck out to me too. The first time I read it, I interpreted it as "it must [stop]," as though there is a tension between talking about struggle and healing from that struggle. Now that I reread it (and thanks to your analysis, Avren), I realize that you can also see it as the deep inherent need to tell one's story ("it must [spin its coarse silk]"). I love how that one line can elicit so much and can be interpreted in both ways.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There it is Avren!
    "But there seems to be a need to control this overwhelm: the poem is in couplets which contain thoughts into digestible moments. Despite the formal restraint these images/feelings still push into each other through enjambment: "Because the blade held by the hand is still a blade / even when used for crushing and not cutting". This pressing together shows that the speaker is trying to hold two conflicting ideas at once and give them the ability to exist simultaneously. She holds together the desire to push away grief and the desire to remember." The interrogation of the poem on more than a content level, but content and form and use. I appreciate this so much.
    e

    ReplyDelete