Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Who's There?

This week’s readings have filled me with a giant dose of imposter syndrome.  I feel like somebody took a huge hypodermic syringe and shot me full of reality pebbles, broken into shards and they’re scraping against the walls of my veins, knocking off ideas of suffering, identity.  They’re scratching new paths into my surfaces and I’m bleeding, bleeding.  Reading Solmaz Sharif made me write a poem:

Solmaz Sharif is burning me with her
   eyes
   staring at me through the searing words of her book, Look
   capturing the occupier
            the American, Hussein’s Iraq
            an eye of an American
            forcing me to look
   what I see
            how puny and privileged my
            own life is
            how cliché and irrelevant
            my pain

that’s not her point (poor myopic American)
Brutality is still
it’s just
I’ve grown so many layers over the
circumcision of my personhood

I’m a cliché – a privileged American.  I’ve never faced the power of the state and the colonial beastiality of the American war state as a foreign occupier in my yard, my house, my father’s pocket contents.

Look was such a powerful book for an American to read.  It set me back on my unexposed haunches and put me to knowing the gritty pain of what is done in my name as an American.  Maybe, like the soldiers, if I see a dog then I won’t ever see a child.  Maybe like her lover, if I see sexual expression as something done to a partner, I never have to see myself or the partner as an “exquisite” object.  Sharif started with the incredibly personal lens of herself through her lover’s calculation of their moment together.  She then expands her view to her uncle who wonders how she saw him, saw into his life, and knew his shame at wetting himself during the war.  Everything is detailed including her claim on identity:  Iranian.  And proud.  Iranian in America.  And still proud.

Natalie Diaz isn’t proud of her brother’s addiction and the toll it’s taken on their parents.  She is however, still proud to love her brother and the family and the members of the Gila Indian Reservation of which she is a part.  She’s not afraid; she’s a survivor of government commodities, and her brother’s self-destruction through meth.

The fidelity Diaz shows her brother throughout his addiction trauma shows up in jessica Care moore’s homage poem to Lupe Fiasco.  There is an inherent acceptance of Fiasco no matter how many rhymes he makes with bitches or how misogynistic (great rhyme – surely it’s be done?) his lyrics can be.  moore is able, through her depictions of rhyme and spit, as a woman in that trench, to own it.  As one who owns the mic, she knows the world Fiasco’s in when he’s in the light.  She’s one too, just the female, more challenged, more disrespected and still able to prove.  Through it all, she loves Fiasco.


We are who we claim to be.  And defend that claim.

2 comments:

  1. Mimi!

    Wow, just wow! I am so shocked by your post, and silenced by awe. I LOVE everything you wrote. In particular: "I’m a cliché". I too have been feeling like all problems I face is so insignificant. Like Angela said on the first meeting day, this is nothing. What we face is nothing. What people, ancestors, and so many in the past and currently face - something so much bigger than myself. I remind myself that. I am a drop in the ocean. We are all but drops in the ocean. But together, let's make the ocean move and sway and thrash as we need it to. Together.

    The words I've read has meant something to me and it's so hard to capture it all and express into words, but it makes me feel little. It makes me feel like there's meaning and worth.

    Thank you,
    Tien Dang

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is both a response and an emotional examination of the self and the journey to understanding positionality, historically and politically. You chartered the movement of the narrative and how it moves through the poem. And responded with poetry. Wouldn't it be fun to send it to Solmaz?
    The other two comments were on the persistence of enduring love--how did that get laid out?
    e

    ReplyDelete